Article

jdsupra.com on 2024-05-01 03:16

U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Legislatively-imposed Permit Conditions Must Satisfy the ‘Essential Nexus’ and ‘Rough Proportionality’ Tests for Takings

In a highly-anticipated case revolving around development impact fees, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, 144 ...

George Sheetz

Related news

SCOTUS Moves On Sheetz: Development Impact Fees Imposed By Legislation Must Pass Takings Scrutiny jdsupra.com
El Dorado , California , Eldorado
U.S. Supreme Court Will Clarify the Constitutionality of Legislatively-Authorized Land Use Exaction Fees jdsupra.com
Matkins , Tigard , California , Placerville , United States
U.S. Supreme Court: Takings Clause Applies to Impact Fees on New Development jdsupra.com
Tigard , Colorado , Nevada , Arizona , California
Supreme Court Considers Whether to Expand Constitutional Takings to Legislative Development Fees jdsupra.com
Cedar Point , Nashville , Tigard , California
Supreme Court Concludes the Takings Clause Applies to Legislative Fee Enactments jdsupra.com
El Dorado , Tigard , Eldorado , California
Court Holds That County’s Traffic Mitigation Fee Was Valid Under the California Mitigation Fee Act and Did Not Violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment jdsupra.com
Johns River , Tigard , Placerville , California
U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Property Owner in Exaction Takings Case jdsupra.com
Johns River , Tigard , California , The Bottom
Supreme Court Leaves the Sheetz Out In Takings Case jdsupra.com
California
The United States Supreme Court Determines There Is No Distinction Between Legislative and Administrative Takings jdsupra.com
California
Court Upholds Concept of Rough Proportionality Invalidating Local Measure jdsupra.com
California , Tigard
Supreme Court Rules Legislative Permit Conditions Not Exempt From Nollan/Dolan Scrutiny jdsupra.com
Tigard , California
Takings/Mineral Rights Lessee: Court of Federal Claims Addresses U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Withdrawal of 404 Permit jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Supreme Court Could Open the Door to “Regulatory Takings” Challenges to Regulations jdsupra.com
Johns River , California
Supreme Court Case Will Clarify Constitutionality of Permit Exaction Fees jdsupra.com
Johns River , Tigard , California , United States , The Bottom
PROPORTIONALITY: Tipping the Scale jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
Supreme Court Rules Legislatively Adopted Exactions Not Exempt From Nollan/Dolan Scrutiny jdsupra.com
California
SCOTUS Rules for Landowner in Fifth Amendment Takings Clause Case jdsupra.com
Tigard , California
Bill gives cities carte blanche ‘takings’ power ocregister.com
New London , California , Manhattan Beach
What Is Proportionality?jdsupra.com
California , United States , Switzerland
U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Take a Second Look at Takings Case jdsupra.com
Tigard , United States , California