DeutschNewstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2024-04-17 21:43
Supreme Court Concludes the Takings Clause Applies to Legislative Fee Enactments
Related news
- U.S. Supreme Court: Takings Clause Applies to Impact Fees on New Developmentjdsupra.com
- Court Holds That County’s Traffic Mitigation Fee Was Valid Under the California Mitigation Fee Act and Did Not Violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendmentjdsupra.com
- Supreme Court Considers Whether to Expand Constitutional Takings to Legislative Development Feesjdsupra.com
- Knick’s Cemetery Decision Buries Williamson - Supreme Court Rules that the Takings Clause Provides Access to the Federal Courtsjdsupra.com
- SCOTUS Rules for Landowner in Fifth Amendment Takings Clause Casejdsupra.com
- SCOTUS Moves On Sheetz: Development Impact Fees Imposed By Legislation Must Pass Takings Scrutinyjdsupra.com
- Court Concludes That Bankruptcy Discharge Does Not Affect Arbitration Clausejdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Concludes That Dynamex Applies Retroactivelyjdsupra.com
- U.S. Supreme Court Establishes New Test for Evaluating Property Rights Under the Takings Clausejdsupra.com
- More New York Legislative Enactmentsjdsupra.com
- Supreme Court Could Open the Door to “Regulatory Takings” Challenges to Regulationsjdsupra.com
- Civil Discovery Act Applies to Public Records Act Proceedings, California Appellate Court Concludesjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Concludes "Regular Rate of Pay" Applies When Calculating Meal and Rest Period Penaltiesjdsupra.com
- California Federal Court Concludes California Franchise Relations Act Applies to Termination of Operator Agreementjdsupra.com
- Eleventh Circuit Finds That Arbitration Clause In One Agreement Applies To Disputes Regarding A Related Agreementjdsupra.com
- U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Legislatively-imposed Permit Conditions Must Satisfy the ‘Essential Nexus’ and ‘Rough Proportionality’ Tests for Takingsjdsupra.com
- Eight Is Not Enough: Ninth Circuit Denies En Banc Review in a Takings Clause Case Over Dissenting Votes of Eight Circuit Judgesjdsupra.com
- In Split Decision, Court Again Applies Castleman To Interpret the “Force Clause” of the Armed Career Criminal Actjdsupra.com
- AIdaho Legislative session concludesarbiteronline.com
- Supreme Court Leaves the Sheetz Out In Takings Casejdsupra.com