DeutschNewstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2022-12-09 19:23
“Yes, San Francisco, There Is A CEQA”: First District Reverses Judgment Upholding City’s Categorical Exemption Determinations For Project To Add Four 90-Foot Tall Light Standards To High School Stadium In Residential Neighborhood
Related news
- CEQA Categorical Exemption Must Be Agendized under Brown Actjdsupra.com
- Failure to Pursue and Exhaust Administrative Appeal Remedy Results In Forfeiture of CEQA Challenge To Categorical Exemption Despite Lower Body’s Defective Hearing Noticejdsupra.com
- Fourth District Upholds San Diego’s CEQA Class 3 Categorical Exemption Determination For Verizon’s Faux Tree Wireless Telecommunications Facility In Dedicated Public Park, Rejects City Charter Inconsistency Argumentsjdsupra.com
- Fourth District Modifies CEQA Categorical Exemption Opinion Involving Palm Springs General Plan Amendment Without Altering Judgmentjdsupra.com
- CEQA Categorical Exemption Case Opinion Ordered Slightly Modified By Supreme Court; Berkeley Hillside Preservation Judgment Is Unaffectedjdsupra.com
- Big House CEQA Exemption on Firm Foundationjdsupra.com
- Legislature Enacts New Statutory CEQA Exemption, Modeled After Class 32 Categorical Exemption, For Certain Infill Multifamily Housing Developments In Urbanized, Unincorporated County Areasjdsupra.com
- Can You Clear Me Now? Sixth District Upholds Santa Cruz County’s CEQA Categorical Exemption For Project To Install Microcell Transmitters On Utility Poles In Rural Aptos Areajdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Protects CEQA Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- It’s Not Unusual: California Supreme Court Declines to Expand “Unusual Circumstances” Exception to CEQA Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- Second District Affirms Judgment Upholding Water Code CEQA Exemption, Rejects Plaintiff’s Attempt To Extend CEQA Review And Findings Requirements To Regional Water Board’s Approval Of Waste Discharge Permitsjdsupra.com
- Neighbor-Led Group Opposing Single-Family Home Expansion Project Failed To Exhaust Administrative Remedies By Making Sufficiently Specific Objections To City’s CEQA Class 1 Categorical Exemption Determinationjdsupra.com
- Third District Declines To Reach CEQA Exemption Claim In Reversing On Other Grounds Judgment Upholding State Department of Public Health’s Approval of Santa Cruz County Needle Exchange Program But Notes New Statutory CEQA Exemption Now Existsjdsupra.com
- Senator Wiener Proposes Targeted CEQA Exemption for Downtown S.F. Projectsjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Establishes the Standard of Review for the Unusual Circumstances Exception to CEQA Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- Court Upholds Infill Development Categorical Exemption for Gas Station in Existing Shopping Centerjdsupra.com
- Fourth District Affirms Judgment Upholding CEQA Class 32 Infill Exemption For Costco Gas Station/Parking Lot Project Within Existing Shopping Centerjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Upholds Most Commonly Used CEQA Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- CA Supreme Court Provides Key CEQA Guidance Regarding Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- First District Upholds CEQA Categorical Exemption for Approval of Planned Parenthood Clinic in City of South San Francisco, Clarifies Implied Finding of No Exceptions is Analyzed for Record Support on Narrowest Possible Groundjdsupra.com