DeutschNewstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2019-04-19 15:20
Legislature Enacts New Statutory CEQA Exemption, Modeled After Class 32 Categorical Exemption, For Certain Infill Multifamily Housing Developments In Urbanized, Unincorporated County Areas
Related news
- Court Upholds Infill Development Categorical Exemption for Gas Station in Existing Shopping Centerjdsupra.com
- Fourth District Modifies CEQA Categorical Exemption Opinion Involving Palm Springs General Plan Amendment Without Altering Judgmentjdsupra.com
- Fourth District Rejects CEQA Challenge To San Diego’s Use of Existing Facilities Categorical Exemption For Mission Beach Amusement Park Lease Amendment and Extensionjdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Protects CEQA Categorical Exemptionsjdsupra.com
- Failure to Pursue and Exhaust Administrative Appeal Remedy Results In Forfeiture of CEQA Challenge To Categorical Exemption Despite Lower Body’s Defective Hearing Noticejdsupra.com
- Fourth District Upholds CEQA Class 32 Infill Exemption For Small Residential Condo Project On Environmentally Sensitive Lands As Consistent With San Diego’s General Plan Despite Failure To Meet Recommended Minimum Densityjdsupra.com
- CEQA Categorical Exemption Case Opinion Ordered Slightly Modified By Supreme Court; Berkeley Hillside Preservation Judgment Is Unaffectedjdsupra.com
- Big House CEQA Exemption on Firm Foundationjdsupra.com
- A Recent Ruling Involving Unlined Landfills Highlights the Pitfalls of Relying on Categorical Exemptions under CEQAjdsupra.com
- Fourth District Upholds San Diego’s CEQA Class 3 Categorical Exemption Determination For Verizon’s Faux Tree Wireless Telecommunications Facility In Dedicated Public Park, Rejects City Charter Inconsistency Argumentsjdsupra.com
- Senator Wiener Proposes Targeted CEQA Exemption for Downtown S.F. Projectsjdsupra.com
- Fourth District Affirms Judgment Upholding CEQA Class 32 Infill Exemption For Costco Gas Station/Parking Lot Project Within Existing Shopping Centerjdsupra.com
- Parking Impacts Warrant Only Limited Consideration under CEQA for Infill Projects in Transit Priority Areas - Court Upholds City of Covina Infill Projectjdsupra.com
- CEQA Roundup – February 2019jdsupra.com
- California Supreme Court Creates Two-Part CEQA Exemption Test in Berkeley Hillsidejdsupra.com
- SB 10 to Facilitate Upzonings, But Does Not Include CEQA Exemption for Corresponding Projectsjdsupra.com
- Second District Affirms Judgment Voiding CEQA Infill Exemption For Hollywood Hotel Project That Would Demolish Affordable Housing Units Because City Deemed Inapplicable And Never Considered Project’s Consistency With General Plan Housing Element Policies To Preserve Affordable Housingjdsupra.com
Lawmaker plans bill to exempt more infill projects from CEQAbizjournals.com- First District Upholds CEQA Class 3 Categorical Exemption For Single Family Residence Projects In Berkeley Hills, Rejects Claim That “Location” Exception Applies Based On Site’s Location Within Mapped Earthquake Fault And Landslide Areasjdsupra.com
- CEQA Year In Reveiw 2018jdsupra.com