Newstral
Article
jdsupra.com on 2024-02-12 23:26
Court of Appeal Confirms (Again) that CEQA Statute of Limitations Runs from the First Project Approval
Related news
- Conditional Approval is Project Approval: Appellate Court Confirms CEQA Statute of Limitations Triggered by Tentative Map Approval Conditioned on Subsequent Rezoningjdsupra.com
- The First Project Approval Establishes the Appropriate Statute Of Limitations for CEQA Challenges, Even When the CEQA Document Is Later Re-Adoptedjdsupra.com
- Misrepresentations Can Bar Agency’s Reliance on CEQA Statute of Limitationsjdsupra.com
- Two CEQA Statute of Limitations Cases, Two Different Resultsjdsupra.com
- Substantial Changes to Marilyn Monroe Art Installation Extends Statute of Limitations to Challenge Under CEQAjdsupra.com
- Recent Court of Appeal Decision Confirms that CEQA Statutes of Limitations Cannot be Extended Without a Project Proponent’s Consentjdsupra.com
- Failure to Describe Project Changes Results in 180-Day Statute of Limitations for CEQA Challenge (Ventura Foothills Neighbors v. County of Ventura)jdsupra.com
- City Approval of Agreement for Tree Removal Triggered 90-Day Statute of Limitations Under Planning and Zoning Lawjdsupra.com
- California Court of Appeal Confirms that Shorter 90-Day Statute of Limitations Applies in Political Reform Act Claims Affecting Land Use Actionsjdsupra.com
- Second District Reaffirms Rule That Filing of Facially Valid NOD Triggers Short CEQA Statute of Limitations And Plaintiff May Not “Go Behind” Agency’s Declarations In Document To Challenge Validity of Project Approvaljdsupra.com
- Filing Multiple NODs does not Restart Statute of Limitationsjdsupra.com
- Properly Posting Notice of Determination Triggers Short CEQA Statute of Limitations Despite Not Providing the Notice to Petitioner as Requestedjdsupra.com
- Exhausting Administrative Remedies Does Not Toll the Statute of Limitations When the CEQA Determination Is Not at Issuejdsupra.com
- Amended Court Rule Provides Certainty for CEQA Statutes of Limitationsjdsupra.com
- Agreement to Extend Statute of Limitations for CEQA Claim Was Ineffective Because It Did Not Include an Indispensable Partyjdsupra.com
- Bankruptcy Court Confirms Enforceability of Mortgage Notwithstanding Expiration of Statute of Limitations for Underlying Promissory Notejdsupra.com
- Sixth District Affirms Judgment Dismissing CEQA Action For Failure To Timely Join Indispensable Real Party Within Limitations Period Triggered By Filing of Second, Valid NOD; Court Rejects Plaintiff’s Arguments Based On Relation Back, Estoppel, and City’s Violation of Statute Requiring It To Mail Operative NODjdsupra.com
- Reversal of Misfortune: Second District Holds CEQA Action Challenging Los Angeles Housing Development Project Barred By Statute of Limitations, Reverses Trial Court Judgment Rejecting MND and Requiring EIRjdsupra.com
- U.S. Supreme Court Rules Statute of Limitations for FDCPA Claim Runs One Year from Alleged Violation, Not Discoveryjdsupra.com
- Judicial Council Revises Its Deadline for Tolling Civil Statutes of Limitations, Including for CEQA Actionsjdsupra.com