Newstral
Article
SF Examiner on 2019-08-24 01:15
Vaping proponents sue SF over language for November ballot measure
Related news
- Feinstein quietly comes out against JUUL-backed vaping ballot measureSF Examiner
- JUUL drops $7 million more into pro-vape SF ballot measureSF Examiner
- Supervisors push ballot measure mandate police foot beats across SFSF Examiner
- Business groups sue SF over universal childcare measure on June ballotSF Examiner
- SF police union to make last push for Taser ballot measureSF Examiner
- SF supes to vote June 2 on Mission market-rate housing moratorium; ballot measure also submittedSF Examiner
- New SF ballot measure takes aim at ‘dark money’ in local politicsSF Examiner
- SF Voters Appear to Uphold City's Vaping BanNBC Bay Area
- SF supervisor proposes changes to the ballot measure processSF Examiner
- SF business tax reform measure lands on November ballotSF Examiner
- SF Yimby campaign $40K in debt over delayed ballot measureSF Examiner
- Juul stops funding San Francisco vaping measurethenewstribune.com