DeutschNewstral
Article
sfbayview.com on 2018-09-28 02:27
Hands off SF’s Sunshine Ordinance: Privacy proponents urge No on Prop B
Related news
Peskin introduces SF’s first-ever ‘Privacy First Policy’ for November ballotSF Examiner
Prop F Has Failed. But the Battle for SF’s Soul Will Go OnWired.com- Scooter complaints to SF’s 311 surgeSF Examiner
- SF’s Department of Technology comes under scrutinySF Examiner
- PORDINANCEpressnews.com
- ILawsuit alleges Colton’s cannabis ordinance violates state law, due process, privacy rightsiecn.com
- SF’s business vacancy tax expanded to 12 additional neighborhood corridorsSF Examiner
- SF’s water supply could use leadership, not litigationSF Examiner
Hitting SF’s funny boneabqjournal.com- Supervisors propose changes to SF’s cannabis equity programSF Examiner
- Uber and Lyft traffic impacts double SF’s own estimatesSF Examiner
- Breed re-elected as SF’s Board of Supervisors presidentSF Examiner
- Brewing bikeshare battle may threaten SF’s Ford GoBike contractSF Examiner
SF’s Millennium Tower Sinking Rapidly, as Seen from Spacebreitbart.com- Breed to appoint Suzy Loftus as SF’s district attorneySF Examiner
Prop 6 opponents outspend proponents almost 11 to 1tooeleonline.com
Prop CC proponents should listen to the mayorcsindy.com
Proponents of Portland’s new rent control ordinance celebrate passagepressherald.com
Danville modifies marijuana ordinance post-Prop. 64eastbaytimes.com