Article

The New York Times on 2018-01-12 04:02

Judges Can’t Agree on Gerrymandering. Can the Justices?

Diverging decisions this week by federal judges in North Carolina and Pennsylvania are certain to draw the Supreme Court’s interest as it mulls ...

Related news

Justices: Federal courts can’t police partisan gerrymandering POLITICO
Justices: Partisan gerrymandering none of our business abqjournal.com
Pennsylvania , Wisconsin , North Carolina , Michigan , Maryland
Justices Won’t Block Pennsylvania Ruling on Gerrymandering The New York Times
North Carolina , Wisconsin , Arizona , Pennsylvania
Justices conflicted on Maryland gerrymandering suit triblive.com
Maryland
GOP Lawmaker Tries to Impeach Justices in Pennsylvania Gerrymandering Ruling observer.com
Pennsylvania
WGerrymandering whartonjournal.com
Pennsylvania , New York
WTF: Can Vermont's Justices of the Peace Serve as Judges?Seven Days
United States , Montpelier , Richmond , Vermont
NNorth Carolina Judges Toss Maps, Slam Gerrymandering in Stinging Ruling nbclosangeles.com
North Carolina
Judges set Oct. 4 for next hearing on Md. gerrymandering thedailyrecord.com
Maryland , Wisconsin , Baltimore , Lash-e Joveyn
Federal judges toss Maryland congressional map for partisan gerrymandering POLITICO
Western Maryland , Maryland
Judges rule Pennsylvania can retain congressional map triblive.com
Harrisonburg , North Carolina , Philadelphia , Washington , Pennsylvania
Judges rule Pennsylvania can keep congressional map Chicago Tribune
Harrisonburg , North Carolina , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania
Judges: Trump can’t exclude people from district drawings San Jose Mercury News
United States , New York
Trump can’t exclude people from district drawings, judges rule staradvertiser.com
United States , New York , Detroit
Courts can’t fix our gerrymandering problem. Take it from gerrymanderer.Washington Post
Switzerland , Israel , Denmark , California , Michigan