Newstral
Article
dothaneagle.com on 2017-01-30 15:11
Lankford: Travel ban's consequences "not well thought out"
Related news
- Feds defend Trump travel ban's refugee capPOLITICO
- The Travel Ban's Ignominious PrecedentsThe Atlantic
- James Lankford blocks unanimous consent vote on Senate bill protecting interstate abortion travelalternet.org
- GOP Sen. Lankford: Trump's Immigration Offer a 'Straw Man Proposal' Not Meant to Become Law breitbart.com
- Lankford marks 95th anniversaryexaminer-enterprise.com
- Oakland Woman Gives Firsthand Account of Travel Ban's ImpactNBC Bay Area
- Supreme Court: No expansion of travel ban's refugee exemptionsUSA today
- Republicans pulled the political football out from James Lankfordbangordailynews.com
- Lankford to chair Homeland Security subcommitteejournalrecord.com
- Lankford: 'We know where every single child is’POLITICO
- Fact Check: Yes, Trump did endorse Sen. James LankfordSan Jose Mercury News
- Lankford hires field representativejournalrecord.com
- LA City Council to look at Trump travel ban's impact on immigrants and LAXdailynews.com
- Trump travel ban's fate hinges on emergency U.S. high court requestThe Japan Times
- Sen. Lankford talks familyheralddemocrat.com
- Lankford receives subcommittee assignmentsjournalrecord.com
- Wright joins Lankford staffjournalrecord.com
- Lankford announces hire, promotionjournalrecord.com
- Trump Hails 'Clear Victory' as U.S. Supreme Court Allows Travel Ban's Partial EnforcementHaaretz