DeutschNewstral
Article
bizjournals.com on 2016-02-20 15:07
Staff says regulators should reject part of Duke Energy’s proposed Asheville natural gas plant as ‘problematic’
Related news
- N.C. regulators offer to ‘split the baby’ on appeal over Duke Energy’s $1.1B Asheville plantbizjournals.com
- Shareholder alleges Duke Energy’s board ‘sanctioned’ improper influence of regulatorsbizjournals.com
- Duke Energy’s Good sees quick close on Piedmont deal once regulators actbizjournals.com
- Customer advocate says regulators should reject Duke Energy's proposed Asheville solar projectbizjournals.com
- Advocacy groups to challenge Duke Energy’s proposed $750M Asheville plantbizjournals.com
- Duke Energy building additional power substations for Ashevillebizjournals.com
- N.C. regulators call for proceeding on Duke Energy’s proposed 14.9% rate hikebizjournals.com
- Federal judge accepts Duke Energy’s coal-ash pleabizjournals.com
- FERC approves $2.8B sale of Duke Energy’s Midwest commercial plantsbizjournals.com
- Bill to help Duke Energy to replace Asheville plant sails through House committeebizjournals.com
- North Carolina regulators approve costly Duke Energy solar project in Ashevillebizjournals.com
- Final cost for Duke Energy’s Sutton plant 18% below original estimatebizjournals.com
Duke plans to build natural gas-fired plant in Ashevillegoupstate.com
Duke announces plans to retire coal plant in Ashevilleblueridgenow.com
Coal ash is focus in Duke Energy’s $478M rate increase bidseattletimes.com- Anger, suspicion dominate S.C. public hearing on Duke Energy’s Foothills transmission linebizjournals.com
- Duke Energy Progress moves on second Asheville-area solar projectbizjournals.com
- Duke Energy’s Lynn Good (barely) scores in top 20 for pay among utility CEOsbizjournals.com